“VERY UNUSUAL CASE”
PUBLICATION OF EVIDENCE BANNED Press Association CHRISTCHURCH, Today. An order forbidding publication of the evidence in a divorce case was made in the Supreme Court this morning, by Mr. Justice Adams, when Olga Raema Birdling proceeded against Harley Albert Birdling. Counsel said it was a proper case for the suppression of evidence. His Honour: In this case it is evident that in the interests of public morals, the evidence should not be published. I therefore make order under Section 55 of the Act. Reporters will understand that this is a very unusual order, lmt this happens to be a very unusual case.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300905.2.113
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1069, 5 September 1930, Page 10
Word count
Tapeke kupu
105“VERY UNUSUAL CASE” Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1069, 5 September 1930, Page 10
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in