Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MOUNT EDEN DESERVES WIN

Bijr hockey was hoped from the I mooting ol‘ .Mount Eden and Xortii ! Shore on Saturday, but the resulting I display was most disappointing and a throw-back to some of the ragged-j play which characterised last season’s hockey. In winning- by I— o, Mount { E»len certainly deserved the extra two ! points the team has secured. Shore was \ outplayed, or rather, out-bustled, particularly in the second session, when ! the brown jerseys forced hotly. r>ull ■ play marked the entire first .-pell, , which was singularly devoid of inci- 1 Went. A feature, however, was the vigilance of the referees, Messrs. Williams and H. Watts. The former was j especially interested in obstructions ' and body-work generally, while Mr. 1 Watts got down on undercutting, and ! succeeded in correcting Anderson end i Mainland, the Eden specialists in this I irregularity. They were not the only i offenders in senior hockey, but had j carried it farther than most others, j hence their being singled out. For the ! re.sr of t he match they played blame- , le.isly, in the opinion of this column. It Niys a good deal for the pair that they accepted ♦he correction in a sports- \ jninlike way, knowing that they had 1 *en dangerous stickmen. On the side- j une favourable comment was voiced tnat the referees are tightening things j IJ \ , n a match which impressed one i ,V th general lack of standard and • d-e majority of whose players on the VL n } ust be branded mediocre, it is j <umoult to sort out any shining lights, i •Aime there were, however, who merit i jjentiwi. First. there is Rankin. Shore hv'nlul' who e^ec ted a number of really H-utr Fletcher, inside tor Eden, was conspicuously dan®K,oUS ’ ant i made the most of a vulner- ;‘ e P at; ch in the Shore defence. It s? re fban 60 per cent, of Eden’s Ins movements originated. Well-tiwi-t’ left, was very fast and bcirii *i. Ut well marked. Hedges ap|.,‘red the most reliable of the halves, Phn, at centre, being wasted. fP r Shore, the forwards were all "JhJS 6 place and rarely looked like f° ala ' Haggett was solid and "burdened at centre-half. Bob nexr - him Was not as of yore, bali r e . e ? ied the mainstay of the fullwiriirt. ' lvl ?. ion * hit hard, but often SlSSdiscretion. It was a match tlvu i*' Ul serve a useful purpose, in a ii v t f. lo;vs that the referees are ofiyo fiy me besetting faults of present-

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300616.2.49

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 999, 16 June 1930, Page 7

Word Count
420

MOUNT EDEN DESERVES WIN Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 999, 16 June 1930, Page 7

MOUNT EDEN DESERVES WIN Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 999, 16 June 1930, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert