NOT CORRECT
T OOKING through the handicap* fc*.r Canterbury Park, one cannot help but notice that handicapper Thomas has applied same penalty to Royal Silk in tb* Ellesmere Handicap as h« meted out to Logan's Pride, » though the latter defeated three-year-old at Hawera. Aft# Logan's Pride won the Hawera off 4.40 Mr. Grosman placed njf on 4.38. with Royal Silk on Enawah (4.38) proved victories* by a narrow margin over Logan Pride, with Royal Silk beaten third. For his second Logan Pride has gone back 24 quite a fair contention, but tunately Royal Silk has also penalised to the same extent his third. This is exceeding limit according to the rule a n< * is the repeated i nconsistencie* Southern adjusters that is cauS* so much trouble over the han capping question generally-
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300524.2.152
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 980, 24 May 1930, Page 12
Word Count
132NOT CORRECT Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 980, 24 May 1930, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in