Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FATHER’S CAR IN CRASH

NOT LIABLE FOR DAUGHTER’S NEGLIGENCE SUCCESSFUL APPEAL Press Association NEW PLYMOUTH, Today. Whether the father is liable to pay damages received through a collision between his car, driven by his daughter, and another car, was the point for decision in an appeal against the judgment of a magistrate that C. A. P. Wood must pay £295 to Andrew Freyne and Thomas B. Freyne. Cars driven by Miss Wood, aged IS, and Freyne, collided, with heavy damage to each. Tho magistrate held that Miss Wood's negligence caused, the collision and awarded Freyne damages. Mr. Justice Reed, in giving a reserved judgment on appeal yesterday, said the question was whether appellant could be held responsible for the damages. The point was whether the daughter could be held to be the agent or servant of her father. The case of the Timaru Borough Council v. Squire had been the precedent on which tlie magistrate had held she was the agent or servant, but Mr. Justice Reed said that since the Timaru decision nad been given the circumstances had changed.

In modern usage the father’s car became the family’s car and .vas driven by various members. If, therefore, when a youth was driving his father’s car he was on his own frolic, the law should not presume to the contrary. If it was desirable that parents should be held responsible for the negligence of their children when in charge of the parents’ car, it was the business of the legislature to say so and the courts should not be required., to enter into a microscopical examination of evidence, to see if it was possible to pick out something from which it might be inferred that the child was on the father’s business when the neg- | ligence occurred. | The appeal was upheld and as an imi portant question of law as involved | leave was granted to appeal to the Court of Appeal. Mr. Justice Reed added his opinion that the magistrate was justified in finding Miss Wood’s negligence responsible for tlie collision.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300327.2.176

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 932, 27 March 1930, Page 16

Word count
Tapeke kupu
341

FATHER’S CAR IN CRASH Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 932, 27 March 1930, Page 16

FATHER’S CAR IN CRASH Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 932, 27 March 1930, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert