Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COLLISION AT SEA

JAPANESE SHIP BLAMED FOR MISHAP COURT DECISION REVERSED Reed. noon. LONDON, Tuesday. The Appeal Court has allowed the Orient Steamship Company’s appeal against Mr. Justice Hill’s judgment of June 12, 192 k, that the liner Otranto and the steamer Kitano Maru were equally responsible for a collision on August 11, 1925. The court, gave judgment that the Kitano Maru alone was to blame. The Japanese sliio Kitano Maru and the Orient liner Otranto collided in the North Sea ia August. 1928. Both vessels had taken the wrong helm, and both failed to take timely engine action. The Admiralty Court decided that both ships were equally to blame. The judge described the evidence of the Kitano Maru witnesses as a concoction to deceive the court.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300129.2.91

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 883, 29 January 1930, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
127

COLLISION AT SEA Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 883, 29 January 1930, Page 9

COLLISION AT SEA Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 883, 29 January 1930, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert