DOCTOR’S DEFENCE

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 815, 8 November 1929, Page 11

DOCTOR’S DEFENCE

(Continued from Page I.) Dorothy Grace Perry, a nurse formerly employed by Share for 12 months. said she was Present at many- examinations of women made b y the doctor. Share was always a gentleman In -very way, gentle, respectful and sympathetic. She had never seen patients ? t he attitude complainant said 'be was required to occupy during the examination. REFLECTION IN MIRROR Frederick Radair said that on Sep- j tember 26, his employer handed him ; sum of money to pay to Share at JL doctor’s consulting rooms. He railed between 11 o’clock and 1 p.ni., an d on looking in the door caught the reflection of the doctor examining the youpg woman. Mrs. Elizabeth Gillam, of Point chevalier, said that she and her sister called on Share at his rooms about midday. The door was half-open. an d her sister looked in and stepped back saying the doctor had a natient. When the case resumed this afternoon. the foreman of the jury asked n-hy Dr. Brockway had not been called to give evidence as it would appear that he might throw some light on the case. Mr. Singer: I will also have something to say about that point later in tlie case. His Honour: We can’t discuss that point just now. The case was then resumed. Mrs. May Brand, a married woman, residing at Point Chevalier, said on jr--ember 26 last she had come to fiiv'n with her sister. She had been under a doctor for the past eight years. She called at Dr. Share's room lo see about some tablets for herself. Dr. Share’s door was open and she could seß he was examining a patient by the reflection in the mirror. She (urnsd away and told her sister he was engaged. It would be about five minutes to 12. There was another man waiting for the doctor. This concluded the case for the defence. “This is one of the most difficult cases that has ever come before the Court.” said Mr. Singer in summing up for the defence. ‘ There is no direct evidence that a crime has been committed. (Proceeding.)