Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“IMPERTINENCE!”

JUDGE AND COUNSEL Lively words were exchanged between Mr. Justice Herdman and Mr. R. A. Singer, representing an accused woman on trial, during the course of his Honour’s summing up, in the Supreme Court yesterday. The trouble arose through counsel’s frequent interruptions of the judge. At first the judge told counsel he would have to keep quiet and that it was not customary to interrupt judges. When a further complaint was made by Mr. Singer, the jud* remarked: “If you have, any observations to make you can do so afterward. It is an unheard of thing and a piece of impertinence to interrupt a judge,’’ added his Honour warmly.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19291105.2.175

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 812, 5 November 1929, Page 16

Word Count
110

“IMPERTINENCE!” Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 812, 5 November 1929, Page 16

“IMPERTINENCE!” Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 812, 5 November 1929, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert