Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“GRATUITOUS OFFER”

TRANSPORT PASSES FOR COUNCILLORS MR. BLOODWORTH CRITICAL Saying that it was gratuitous of the Transport Board to offer “halffree” passes in transport in Auckland for members of the City Council, Cr. T. Bloodworth last evening criticised the withdrawal of free passes used by councillors. QR. J. R. LUNDON had moved that the council should accept with appreciation the offer of the hoard to provide each councillor with an annual pass costing not more than £6 6s. After a long address by the mover, Cr. Bloodworth mentioned that the councillors once had free passes, by Act of Parliament, for use in the City’s service. Doubt that the Transport Board was elected as in accordance with the Act was expressed by Cr. Bloodworth. He went on to say that the board did not have the right to take away the passes given to councillors under Act of Parliment. He was prepared to test his assertion. The council could, he said, deprive him of his pass hy resolution, hut the board could not do that. By the Act one of the liabilities taken over by the board was the permission given to councillors to have free transport. “The board has exceeded its authority in withdrawing the passes,” Cr. Bloodworth said. “It has not power to discriminate between one local body or another, or between citizens. It must give either a free pass or charge a rate the same as that for any other citizen. “We should not accept its gratuitous offer, as Cr. Lundon proposes. Members of the board are saying that their services to the community are twice as valuable as ours; they have free passes—ours are ‘half-free,’ and in the City’s service. I would rather walk than ride ‘half-free’ at the courtesy of the Transport Board.” Cr. Lundon rose to reply, but a motion that the question be put made by Cr. A. .1. Entrican, seconded by Cr. G. W. Hutchison, was carried and Cr. Lundon’s motion was lost. CHEAP TICKETS FOR ALL CR. LUNDON’S SCHEME LAPSES Quarterly, half-yearly and yearly tickets for use on the trams and buses for the travelling public were suggested to the council by Cr. J. R. Lundon, who asked councillors to affirm the idea and pass it on to the Transport Board. In discussing his motion, the councillor said many of the highly-paid council and Transport Board officials were given the chance of using such tickets at a reduced rate. He therefore could not see why the principle should not be extended to the general public. The motion lapsed for want of a seconder.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290802.2.50

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 731, 2 August 1929, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
431

“GRATUITOUS OFFER” Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 731, 2 August 1929, Page 6

“GRATUITOUS OFFER” Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 731, 2 August 1929, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert