Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MOTOR FATALITIES

WHAT IS NEGLIGENCE? JUDGE’S INTERPRETATION Negligent driving in relation to motor fatalities was interpreted by Mr. Justice Herdman in the course of summing up in a charge in the Supreme Court to-day. “If it is proved that the driver has committed a breach of his duty to the public, he is guilty of negligence,” remarked his Honour, “and if it is proved that this negligence was the cause of death, it would he the jury’s duty to convict. The person who drives a car on the highway is under an obligation to exercise the reasonable care and prudence that an ordinary and prudent and skilful driver would display. If the driver fails to conform to these requirements, and as a result of his negligence .death was caused, he is guilty.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290514.2.122

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 662, 14 May 1929, Page 11

Word Count
132

MOTOR FATALITIES Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 662, 14 May 1929, Page 11

MOTOR FATALITIES Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 662, 14 May 1929, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert