SCANDAL IN THE NAVY
Your leading article on Thursday concerning- the “Scandal in the Navy" hit the nail on the head, but failed to * t . ri ?ht home. Without doubt Rear-Admiral Collard ought also to be USne<l J or conduct and punished for the use of BiPingsbut the seriousness of notorious business goes deeper than Dered irt ry correction of a bad-tem-a and Peevish officers. It affects the usefulness of the Haw £?o‘ooo non the sen;,e uf spending officers °" - a bat -tlcshi P if its to souahhil i?, hlns better to do than The S^avv”Fi?Y, n t OVer ltS not won by jazling y ad S Oak court mt^- U , Pldlties of th * R oyal COLLINGWOOD.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19280407.2.56.6
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 323, 7 April 1928, Page 6
Word Count
116SCANDAL IN THE NAVY Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 323, 7 April 1928, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in