PARTNERS DISAGREE
TAILORING BUSINESS MISMANAGEMENT ALLEGED The sequel to a partnership in an Auckland tailoring business was heard at the Supreme Court to-day when William Henry Craig (Mr. Glaisterr) brought an action against Sydney George Pudney (Mr. Dickson), to recover £7lO 17s under the guarantee in respect of a mortgage. Defendant denied that the money was owing, and said that it was a partnership between himself an plaintiff. He added that plaintiff’s son was employed in the business, and that plaintiff was responsible for his son’s neglect in its management. After hearing evidence, Mr. Justice Stringer held that accounts must proceed on the basis that the father was responsible for the son’s 'actions. His Honour also held that Pudney’s share was only one-third.
He ordered the taking of accounts by a public accountant.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19271013.2.84
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 174, 13 October 1927, Page 9
Word Count
133PARTNERS DISAGREE Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 174, 13 October 1927, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in