COMPULSORY UNIONISM.
ARBITRATION COURT POWERS. Pliß riticsa AasOOIATrON. Wellington, May 5. The Appeal Court gave its decision lin the case Magner v. Cohns, involvj ing the question whether the Arbitraj tion Court has jurisdiction to insert in an award a provision amounting to compulsory unionism. The Court was unanimous that the Arbitration Court : had no such jurisdiction, and it held that before a court could, insert such a provision the intention of the Legislature to grant such power must bo indicated with irresistible clearness, and tiie present statute did not so express simh intention. The Court, however, held that the Arbitration Court had jurisdiction to grant preference to unionists.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19160506.2.28
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXX, Issue 27, 6 May 1916, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
109COMPULSORY UNIONISM. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXX, Issue 27, 6 May 1916, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in