Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Great Britain

»*w« . “~THE LUSITANIA. I’.MTKU I’KICKS ASSOCIATION'. London. .July 17. Lord Mersey’s judgment is that the suhjnai• i ll e iutoiitlod to destroy the Lusitania, and also the people on hoard ; that the ship was not warned ; that she was unarmed; and that tier captain was not blameworthy. ihe whole hlaiue lor the cruel catastrophe rested with the perpetrators ol the crime. lie declined to discuss the evidence concerning the Admiralty’s precautions, hut said that it was plain that the Admiralty had devoted anxious care and thought to the submarine peril. They had collected all information likely to affect the Lusitania’s vo;.ape. ami had hilly advised Captain J'ur..,T. The latter, in some respects, had not followed the advice, but it is doubtful if the vessel would otherwise have reached Liverpool. Ihe Admiralty’s advice had not deprived him of his right to use his skill Anti judgment in a difficult situation. The omission to iollow that advice was not

attributable to negligence . Everything was,done to get out the oats, and the complaints thereanent, and also 'the allegations about leaky boats, were ill-founded. Lord Mersey added that no opportunity ol escape was afforded the Lusitania. She carried a number of eases of cartridges, which were shown on the manifest, and she was not violating any American law. He said that the torpedoing was done, not merely to sink the ship, but to destroy the lives of the passengers . Herman statements that the Lusitania • was armed were baseless inventions, condemning those who used them as a warning aaginst passengers sailing by the Lusitania. It was an aggravated crime, proving to have been deliberately planned. Sir R. Carson’s statement. that it was an act of deliberate murder, was not one whit too strong. The defenceless on board were doomed to death by the snhmaijfne’s crew acting under the direction’of the German Government’s officials. His opinion was that nothing in the cargo exploded.

Lord Mersey paid a tribute to the heroism of Leslie Morton, an eighteen-year-old sailor, who first sighted the torpedoers. He was afterwards thrown into the water, and was in instrumental in saving eighty or ninety passen-

«;ers. Mr Clem Edwards, on behalt ol the crew ol' the Lusitania, suggested that the costs ol' the seamen’s representation at the inquiry be borne by the nation, in the hope that it iniitht ultimately he included in the enemy’s indemnity. Lord Mersey invited Mr Edwards to discuss' the point with him at a more convenient season.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19150719.2.31

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXVII, Issue 67, 19 July 1915, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
412

Great Britain Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXVII, Issue 67, 19 July 1915, Page 8

Great Britain Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXVII, Issue 67, 19 July 1915, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert