Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HUIROA.

OttOM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT.] Ou Saturday, May loth, a team re- ’ presenting Douglas School visited Huiroa and played a return cricket match [against the local boys. On a previous I occasion the Huiroa boys had visited Douglas, and registered a win by an innings and two runs, but on this occasion Douglas, showing greatly improved lorin a reversed the position, winning by an innings and twelve runs. In their extra innings they also put up a good score. The teams are now level, Huiroa having won th,e two matches played at Douglas, and Douglas having won each ot the two return matches played at Huiroa. It is evidently not considered the correct 1 thing between these teams to subject the visitors to such inhospitable treatment as a beating. In this last match • those showing best form with the bat | were H. Wylie (21), Leo. Needham (15), 15. Wilrnshurst c 11) (Douglas), [and H. Evans (11) (Huiroa). In their extra innings the following Douglas boys also made good scores —K. Webb (21), J. Walter (14), B. Wilrnshurst (12), and H. McLellau (11). Following are the scores: — HUIROA—Ist Innings—R. Evans run out, 0; S. Smitheram, 1; P. Hancock, 3; A. Eagles, 0; iR. Stanford, 1 ; lE. Perrott, 0; C. Carmichael, 2; P. Griffin, not out, 3; G. Stanford, 0; F. Kidd, 0; J. Thomas, 0. Extras 6. Total IG. Bowling analysis: Leo Needham 1 for 14, H. Wylie 5 tor G. 2nd Innings—R. Evans, 11; S. Smitheram,?; P. Hancock, 0; A. Eagles, 4; R. Stanford, 8; E. Perrott, 3; C. Carmichael, 8; P. Griffin, 0; G. Stanford, I); F. Kidd, 0; J. Thomas, not out, 0. Extras 4.Total 45. Grand total 61. Bowling analysis—Leo Needham I for 3; H. Wylie 0 for 10, A Walter 3 for 8; C. Rogers 1 for 7; S. Webb 3 for 6, J. Walter 2 for 7. DOUGLAS —Ist Innings—J. Walter, 9; K. Webb, 0; A. Walter, 6; W. Lockhead, 0; B. Wilrnshurst, 10; Leo Needham, 15; S. Webb, 1; H. Wylie, 21; H. McLellau, 3; Les. Needham, not out, 2; C. Rogers, 2. Extras 4. Total 73.. Bowling analysis—ll. Evans 2 for 7, A. Eagles 4 for 24, P. Hancock 2 for 22, E. Perrott 2 for 16. Extra Innings—K. Webb, 21; J. Walter, II; A. Walter, 3; W. Lockhead. 8; B. Wilrnshurst, 12; Leo Needham, 1; H. Wylie, 6; S. Webb, 5; H. McLellan,9; Les Needham, 11; C. Rogers, 0. Extras 9. Total 99. The bowling analysis for this innings was not kept!, practically all the members of the team having a turn. After the match all present were entertained at tea provided by many of the ladies of the district, and served in the schoolroom by them—attentions that were greatly appreciated.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19150528.2.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXVII, Issue 24, 28 May 1915, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
459

HUIROA. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXVII, Issue 24, 28 May 1915, Page 2

HUIROA. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXVII, Issue 24, 28 May 1915, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert