Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"Hypocritical Sham,”

HOME RULE FOR IRELAND.

GOVERNMENT NOT ENCOURAGED [By Electric Telegraph—Copyright {United Press Association.] (Received 11.20 a.m.) London, March 16. Mr Asquith, Premier, in the House of Commons, said that if the Government proposals were rejected, it would bo a waste of time to formulate details for discussion. He was not pre-

pared to put a cut-aud-dried scheme on paper, as be wished to keep the discussion to the main issue. If accepted, the Bill would require administrative and financial adjustments, as a Lord Lieutenant would have no jurisdiction in England. The Government was not much encouraged by the reception of the proposals. Replying to Mr Bonar Law, Mr Asquith promised to afford an opportunity to discuss the proposals at the earliest date. Sir Edward Carson interjected a remark that the course the Government was now taking showed the proposals to he a hypocritical sham.

THE PREMIER’S TASK.

London, March 16

Unionist jiewspapers complain that Mr Winston Churchill’s peremptory tone in the speech cabled yesterday is calculated to increase the difficulties of the Premier’s immediate task, and argue that the challenge and “take it or leave it” offer, as stated, are unjustified until the Premier discloses far more about it than heretofore. Meanwhile, to-day’s statement is eagerly awaited. It is understood that Mr Asquith does not intend to make any further offer or withdrawal of the existing one at present. The Chronicle attributes the Unionist objection to the Ulster time limit to the belief that two general elections will not displace the present Government, and adds.: “The Ministry offer an olive branch and is anxious to conciliate, but they will not bo blackmailed.”

AN AUSTRALIAN PARALLEL.

London,,March 16

Sir John Fuller, in a letter comparing the Ulster case with West Australia, says that had West Australia been threatened with a definite inclusion in the Commonwealth, whether or not she liked it, she would not in all probability to-day have been playing her important part within the Commonwealth.

A “TIMES” FORECAST.

London, March 1(5

The Times declares that there is a distinct hardening of opinion in all c uarters that Mr Asquith will probably make it clear that if his offer proves ultimately unacceptable as a basis of settlement it will not be submitted to a vote of the House of Commons •or given any other mark of permanence.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19140317.2.32

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 73, 17 March 1914, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
389

"Hypocritical Sham,” Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 73, 17 March 1914, Page 5

"Hypocritical Sham,” Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 73, 17 March 1914, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert