IRISH HOME RULE.

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXII, Issue 39, 29 January 1912, Page 5

IRISH HOME RULE.

ULSTER UNIONISTS SAID TO BE SATISFIED. INTENSE FEELING AROUSED. London, January 27. Lord Londonderry, replying to Mr Churchill’s letter, said the main objections of the Ulster Unionists had been removed, and therefore ho deprecated any interference with Mr Churchill’s- meeting, but he would not accept the responsibility of the visit, owing to the intense feeling aroused. Sir Cornthwaite Rason, speaking at York, referring to the comparison between Home Rule for Ireland and the overseas dominions, declared that if Australia was where Ireland was Australia would never diave asked and never have had self-government. WILL THE USE OF SOLDIERY BE NECESSARY? TROOPS WARNED FOR DUTY. London, January 27. The “Daily Chronicle” states that throe regiments' of '“infantry a fid' tVo of cavalry have been ordered to hold themselves in readiness to proceed to Belfast. A LABOURITE’S CONCEPTION OF MR. CHURCHILL’S DUTY. NO HALL YET FOUND. (Received 29, 8.40 a.m.) London, January 28. Mr'' Ramsay MacDonald, at Leicester, said he would vote for Home Rule. He was amazed that Mr Churchill had yielded. His duty was to go to Ulster as Luther had gone to Worms. No hall has yet "been found for Mr Churchill at Belfast.