Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RULES OF PROCEDURE

LAXITY CONDEMNED.

COMMENT BY CHIEF JUSTICE.

(Per United Press Association.)

Wellington, May 28. A statement that he would not countenance laxity in the observance of rules regarding discovery and other rules of procedure was given in the Supreme Court by the Chief Justice. He said he had noticed that affidavits were brought time and again before the court to the effect “I am informed etc.” There was a rule that where a statement was made of that kind, that the source of information and the ground for the belief should be stated® That rule, to his mind, must be insisted tin.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19300529.2.33

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Southland Times, Issue 21095, 29 May 1930, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
104

RULES OF PROCEDURE Southland Times, Issue 21095, 29 May 1930, Page 6

RULES OF PROCEDURE Southland Times, Issue 21095, 29 May 1930, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert