ESKIMO PIE
ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS. CASE BEFORE SUPREME COURT (Per United Press Association.) Dunedin, May 26. In the Supreme Court to-day before Mr Justice Kennedy, Charles Bertram Colby, of Los Angeles, proceeded against the Dunedin Ice Cream Manufacturing Company on a claim for an injunction for alleged infringement, of patent rights. Mr Parry, of Wellington, who appeared for plaintiff, claimed that the confection known as Eskimo Pie, and the process of its manufacture were protected under Letters Patent, and that the manufacture of “Royalettes” by defendant company was an infringement of those rights. For defendant, Mr Sinclair claimed that plaintiff had wrongly obtained from his predecessors, Letters Patent for an alleged new article which was not really new, nor was the process new. It was also claimed that the application must fail on the ground of want of novelty. The defence contended that in respect of foodstuffs and medicinal preparations, the process should be new before letters could be obtained, whereas the process of manufacture in this case was a combination of simple and wellknown processes which were among the oldest known in the confectionary trade. His Honour reserved his decision.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19300527.2.48
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Southland Times, Issue 21093, 27 May 1930, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
193ESKIMO PIE Southland Times, Issue 21093, 27 May 1930, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Southland Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.