breaking a saucer, it mi?ht be accidentally, did no damage. He said he wanted to find some baking soda. The prisoner was discharger!, His Worship remarking that there wns no evidence connecting him with the offence sufficient to warrant a commit'til. The prisoner was then charged with stealing from the same house, two spoons, a knife and fork, a qumtitv of gor9e see 1, anH two fowls The evidence of the boy Hunt was clear enough on this charge, and His Worship, remarking that though the value of the articles taken from the houfta was but small, larceny of goods under tho pr.itection of a house was a much more serious offence than simple larceny, sentenced the prisoner to 14 days' imprisonment, with hard labor. Brodrick v. Mairorie. — \fr Wade applied for^ an adjourn Tient till to-day, stating that, the other side ha.l agreed to this, the dispute being now in the course of amicable settlement. Adjournment granted. The case has since been withdrawn.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST18720423.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Southland Times, Issue 1568, 23 April 1872, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
164Untitled Southland Times, Issue 1568, 23 April 1872, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.