RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, RIVERTON.
I (Before D. S. Lawlor, Esq., E.M.) TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19. MADDEK AND ASTOTHEB T. CLAPP. The defendant was sued for the sum of £2, the amount of a promissory note given by him to plaintiff. Verdict for the plaintiff, without costs. MADDEN AND AtfOTHEB Y. MABTIN. This case was similar to the other as , to the amount sued for, the only way in which it differed being that, instead of a promissory note having been given by defendant, it was an 1.0.TJ. After a long hearing, and a good deal of hard swearing on the part of the defendant, the case was adjourned for the production of further evidence for the defence.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST18670222.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Southland Times, Issue 635, 22 February 1867, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
116RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, RIVERTON. Southland Times, Issue 635, 22 February 1867, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in