Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Legal Notes.

THE HIRE SYSTEM. AH IMPORTANT DECISION. There will be weeping and wailing (writes our London contemporary, Truth) amongst those who deal in musical instruments at the recent decision in the Court of Appeal in the case of “ Helby v. Mathews and others.” For many years it has been possible to those possessed of moderate, but certain, incomes to obtain a piano upon what is now generally known as the “ hire system.” The vendor held ont an inducement to the purchaser to become the possessor of an instrument at once by entering into a contract to band over certain sums at stated periods until the whole of the purchase-money had been thus repaid. But, meanwhile, the instrument (up to now) was recognised as the undoubted property of the vendor, until such time as the transaction was completed, and could be reclaimed by him if a failure took place in payment of even the last of the instalments.

In the above case, all the recognised precautions were taken by the plaintiff (the vendor), but after paying seven instalments the hirer pawned the piano with the defendants ; this coming to the knowledge of the vendor, through the non-receipt of the next payment when due, he brought an action in the County Court against the pawnbroker who bad purchased the instrument, which was decided in his favour. The Divisional Court affirmed this judgment, but gave leave to appeal. The Master of the Rolls and Lord Justices Smith and Davey are responsible for the wave of tribulation, which, with a harsh and discordant note, will sweep across the hire traffic in musical instruments. Under a section of a certain Act, which up to now has not been brought to bear on these cases, the hirer in selling can, it appears, give a good title to the purchaser, and the vendor is not in a position to recover his property. I refrain from making any comment on the “justice ” of this decision, but I do express my sympathy with the class which will now be debarred from obtaining instruments on comparatively easy terms, since there is no doubt that the dealers will, in selfdefence, have to abandon the present “ lime system.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SOCR18940804.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Southern Cross, Volume 2, Issue 19, 4 August 1894, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
367

Legal Notes. Southern Cross, Volume 2, Issue 19, 4 August 1894, Page 3

Legal Notes. Southern Cross, Volume 2, Issue 19, 4 August 1894, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert