Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DANGER OF 'COMFORTERS'

RISK OF INFECTION. CHRISTCHURCH, Nov. 22. Because, they expose the child to infection of all manner of complaints, "comforters'* should be abolished in New Zealand, as they have been in France, Dr. G. J. Blackmore, Medical Superintendent of Consumptive Sanatoria, said today. "It is a perfectly logical move, and should have been carried out years ago," said the doctor, speaking of the French decision. "The French Government did prohibit them some time ago, but the Senate did not agree to it.

"Comforters are very unhealthy; there is no telling what sort of things they pick up, and they are most unhygienic. I have told the nurses at the Cashmere Fresh Air Home that the children must never be allowed to have comforters.

"It is purely a matter of hygiene so far as we are concerned," continued Dr. Blackmore, "but I am not suro that the constant sucking of • these things has not a bad effect or otherwise. It is not natural; constant sucking creates a large amount of secretion. This is intended for the softening' of foods and is not intended to be constantly poured out and absorbed into the stomach. But the , great thing, of course, is just a matter of health from the infection point of view.' t In a house where here is consumption, the germs fall about the patient's bed and on to the floor. Now, if a child lets it's comforter fall on the floor and then puts it into its mouth, it is also putting germs there. That is the trouble. All sorts of germs must get on to these things, and they certainly should be abolished.

It was reported yesterday that the London "Daily Mail's" Paris correspondent reports that the Chamber of Deputies in 1917, following the rep k-e----scntations of Dr. Pinard, a children's specialist, forbade the sale of infant's rubber comforters as dangerous and unhealthy. The Senate, having contrary scientific advice, vetoed the Bill five times. Despite "the victory of the advocates of the comforter at an inquiry by the Senate's Hygenic Committee, the Senate now agrees to adhere to the verdict, of a joint committee of doctors and scientists.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SNEWS19271202.2.20

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Shannon News, 2 December 1927, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
361

DANGER OF 'COMFORTERS' Shannon News, 2 December 1927, Page 3

DANGER OF 'COMFORTERS' Shannon News, 2 December 1927, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert