Gracious non-reply
• It was gracious of the Ruapehu District mayor to respond to my letter regarding proposed Powderhorn parking but he failed rather conspicuously to answer any of the points raised. Presumably the parking problem was not addressed when the Powderhorn was granted planning permission. We are going to hasten into a short term solution (option) as the Thames Street option (solution) is not available for a few months. Because the idea is not new it must be all right, and we are not going to be told for how long we will be without that desirable grassed area. If cogent reasons for the proposed action exist, is it unreasonable we should be informed of them instead of being treated as though we have no brains, and then perhaps we could compromise to a degree as well. BL Maples
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RUBUL19950530.2.19.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 12, Issue 588, 30 May 1995, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
139Gracious non-reply Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 12, Issue 588, 30 May 1995, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Ruapehu Media Ltd is the copyright owner for the Ruapehu Bulletin. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Ruapehu Media Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in