Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WCHWC's view of future

The Health Watch Committee had prepared a list of services they see as important to retain, and lists of which are essential for government funding and which are lower priority. These lists are defined by the government as positive and negative. That is, positive items that should be funded by government, and negative items that should not be on the list. Services which the WHWC sees as impor-

tant to retain include: Health education & promotion; general practitioners and their practice nurses; chemists; dentists & dental therapist; nursing services - Plunket, Hospital and community; support volunteers; home care; ambulance (should be trained and efficient, local -both road and air); physiotherapist; treatment and assessment area (for patients prior to transfer out of the area if necessary); Hospital and other social workers.

Also on the list is affordable access to: paediatric care, secondary care services, specialist clinics, staff (health workers) education, radiology and scan, laboratory and diagnostic, cervical screening (Well Women's). Positive list Those aspects they see as essential for government funding include: Maternity & obstetric; neonatal care; prevention; Acute medical (diabetes - asthma-heart disease, surgical, or-

thopaedic, cancer); cervical screening; miscarriage care; burns; sexually transmitted diseases; fractures; acute back problems; paediatric (acute, abuse, immunity, congenital, glue ear, tonsils, ENT, diabetes, asthma); contraception (access to services, education); general surgery, acute eye problems, diagnostic laboratory; counselling (drug & alcohol abuse); accessibility (GP, Spec, X rays); education - prevention; transport;

geriatric. care (assessment) Negative list Aspects seen by the WHWC as lower priority for funding include: high tech neonates; non-ur-gent surgery (eg hysterectomy, varicose veins, piles, bunions); infertility (treatment, diagnosis, IVF); cosmetic surgery, obesity, joint replacement, backs - non acute, adult ENT, cataracts, dermatology, haemotological.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RUBUL19911022.2.47

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 9, Issue 409, 22 October 1991, Page 11

Word count
Tapeke kupu
277

WCHWC's view of future Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 9, Issue 409, 22 October 1991, Page 11

WCHWC's view of future Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 9, Issue 409, 22 October 1991, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert