LayirijS of Poison - - . No'twithstanding that the Rahbit Nuisance Act provjdes RdbDit Boards with powers to lay jpoisqri arid -to carry out poisoning operatio'riri' that may not he employed hy the oridiriary individual, nevertheless boards riiuSt ■ exercise reasonabTe Care. rii se|irig that their operations do not endarig^r the live stock of farmers and othefs. • This was the view expressed hy Mr. S. L. Paterson, -S.M., iri de*rivetmg judgmient for plain-tiff in a -case dealt ; -$ith at the Cambridge « Court;. dn ' Thtoisday last, when. J. A. TKoiri^sdri, farmer, of Te Miro claimed £14' 17ri 2d ftorii the. Maungakawa Rahhit Board for the loss of two dogs hy allege'dpoisoning.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19331017.2.50.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 3, Issue 664, 17 October 1933, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
106Page 5 Advertisements Column 1 Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 3, Issue 664, 17 October 1933, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in