THE ARBITRATION ACT
NO LONGER EFFECTIYE IN ' ' FACE OF REiCENT 1 DECISION S N COMPLETELY OVER-RipDEN Auckland, Saturday. High legal opinion isi that th'e decision of the Court of Appeal in the Auckland case of the fnspector - of Awards against K. and W. Hellahy, Ltd., means that as a means of settling industrial disputes the Arbitratioxx Court is no long'6r effective. ' It was stated to-day, that it is now open to employers or employe'es in a'ny dispute to get rid of the award - in that itxdustry, for as a result of' the Court of Appeal's decision it is clear that unless all the parties are able to come to an agreement in Gonciliation Council, then no industrial agreement affecting that industry can be rna'de. The decision virtually overrides that given by the Arbitration Court in the Chi'istchurch Grocers' case, and closes the nxeans of access to the Court.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19330724.2.48
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 591, 24 July 1933, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
148THE ARBITRATION ACT Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 591, 24 July 1933, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in