LABOUR CRITICAL
•GGVERNMjENT APPR'OVAL Rugby, July 17. In the Hotise of Commons, Sir Samiael IIoare.( Secretary for India), said the Viceroy's reply to Mr, Gandhi had the full concurrence of the Government. The general support of law and order In tndia was daily hecoming stronger, aiid a summary of Indian press views indicated a strong feeling among the Congress rank and file against the continuance of an unlawful and uncoiastitutional progranime. There was only one "cotirse open to the Government. There could be no questidn of fiiaking a bargain with Cottgress as a condition of its acceptance of the ordinary obligations of law and abiding citizens. Should Have Been Accepted The Leader of the Opposition, Mr. George Lansbury, following Sir Samuel Iloare, described the Viceroy's reply to Mr. Gandhi, as a disgrace. Mr. Gandhi sent no threat, and his olive bfanch should have been accepted. Mr. Robert Barnays (National Liberal — Bristol North) , said though a personal friend of Mr. Gandhi, he agreed that the Viceroy had no other course than to refuse an interview after the way Mr. Gandhi broke his pact with Lord Irwin,by continuing to promote disobedience.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19330719.2.35.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 587, 19 July 1933, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
189LABOUR CRITICAL Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 587, 19 July 1933, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in