GOODS TRANSPORT

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 587, 19 July 1933, Page 4

GOODS TRANSPORT

MANY APPUcJ CENTRAL AUTH0R1tv1 remainder opl cases j AGREEMENTS 1 Further applications J service licenses were hppH Central (Transport) lJ ority, consisting 0f Sir St3 and Mr. II. B. S. Johnston| day. In most cases the eviJ \ ^ltted c°Yered that produel | her cases and the applj confined to renewal of l;cJ ready carried on autohiatiJ the passing of the TrJ 1931. mp| In appearing for Mrs li (Te Puke), Mr. E. Roe' 1 was desired that a licensVI radius of 40 miles begranJ plicant. In this case the al was almost entirely diifei that °f others considered 1 Guy's business comprised n riage of livestock from farl district to saies. In no sejJ service conflict with the rdil since 1929, when it had hel I menced, an exte-nsive busiJ been built up. He detailed tl since 1929, which showedl cent. increase in business, 1 matic license was desired. 1 Mr. H. Guy, husbandof 1 corroborated this statemel 'said that the livestock m| from farms to the raihvavj To Mr. M. H. Hampson, said it was not desired toi nature of the business andl objection to it being a condl goods were not taken fromfl to Rotorua or vice versa, 1 The application was graifl the provision that it does m the Whakatane township asfl licensee does not pick up 9 tween Rotorua and TaurahJ Service to Tauran 9 An application by Dawl Sons for a license betweeM and Tauranga was granil amendments sug-gested hy ■ way Departme-nt to the efl goods are not to be pioke! tween Te Puke and Tauran! outward trip or set dom! Tauranga and Te Pukeon! ward trip. Timber onlyis! ried between Rotorua and! The number of vehicles it! to four. A Agreement ReacheS By th agreement upon c! strictions affecting the fiaifl partment and competingliH .area license over the Taura® rua and Taupo districts™ jected to in the case of A.® of Rotorua, for whom ® Davys appeared. ® Mr. Davys said that in al operating as a general carfl tractor the applicant also h® contracts and the carriage ■ isers. The application for® in the Whakatane county® withdrawn. The cream 9 covered the Tauranga and E® counties. In conference ® Wilson, it had been agreeB objection would be raisedB vrero not carried between ® and Tauranga and also an ment was suggested thatn goods he carried between H and Tauranga and Koto# Taupo witliout the consent® and Sons or H. Langgutbn The area license over ■ Rotorua and Taupo subjectH strictions suggested, was * Other Application® The application of C. B® ald for a license embracin® Whakatane and Tauranga® ed on the deletion of Matai® the application. McAlees® rell, who also deleted ® from their application, vvei® ful in ohtaining a route® the Rotorua county. ■ Of other cases set down® ion that of J. C. Fleniing,® f ected a service to Aucklan® i-ourned until Septembe1' ® anplications of W. Mc^enn L. Ricliards were adjournej| ing by the No. 4 AuthoriW ing the Taupo county. 'S not appear to presen |n this aimlicationjvas als^M