N.Z. WHO'S WHO
(Press Assn. — 1
TWO PARTIES GO TO LAW OVER TITLE OF BOOK
3y Telegraph — Copyrig ht\
Wellington, Tuesday. S'eelcing an injunction to prevent the International Press Serviee As? sociation from publishing a hook of New Zealand biographies with the same title, or a similar .one, to his own, Dr. Scholefield, Parliamentary Librarian, took action in the Supreme Court to-day. After counsel had spoken and some discussiori had taken place between the parties, an adjournment was taken. Later it was announced that settlement had been reached. Defendants agreed to change the title of their publication to "th'e International Press Who's Who in New Zealand, i933," such title to be printed in uniform type and similar to the specimen lodged iri court. Plaintiff is to have leave to issue an injunction if defendants at any time eommit a breach of settiement. In the cour'se of counsel's address it was mentioned that Dr. Scholefield's sole revenue from the publication was from saies, but the International j Press made a charge of £20 and £40 for printing a biography and photograph. Mr. Justice Ostler mentioned that the change in titie Should not affect defendant's contract.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19330621.2.36
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 563, 21 June 1933, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
194N.Z. WHO'S WHO Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 563, 21 June 1933, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in