Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NATIONAL AIR FORCE

The publication of figures in I the League of Nations Year

Book concerning the relative I strengths of national air fleets j has caused consiclerable com- ! ment in the Empire press. The | fact that Britain stands numerii cally at the bottom of the list is ! not at all pleasing to those who j hold the firm opinion that mastI ery of the air will form the j dominating factor in the next war. A recent cable pointed out that Britain, who at the end of ; the war possessed the world's | largest air force, has reached the ! present position of numerical inj feriority throngh her own acj tion. This diminution of strength I however, is more apparent than | real. The balance has been ad- ' justed by achievements in engin- | eering design and workmanship I which have placed Great Britain | in the forefront of world airma.n- ' ship. What has been lost in num- | bers has been made up in quality ] and performance. Great Britain possesses the fastest and most - j efficient aircraft in the world, ! and since speed and reliability I are the winning factors in aerial | warfare, quality, rather than | numbers, is the best measure of j ; comparative strengths. "As a j matter of fact," states "The j j Aeroplane" in an editorial comj ment, "we probably have just as I many effeetive first-line aeroi planes as has France, and perhaps more, because all of ours actually fly." This, of course, is a comforting assurance, but it is not enough to quieten public apprehensions concerning the future. Conceding all that may be ; argued in regard to quality as against numbers, the fact re- ; mains that the , odds in actual , warfare are in favour of numi bers. The Freneh preponderance | over Britain is nearly one thou- | sand. The disparity is too great. | It is not a question of Britaip ! versus France, or any other na- ; tion, but of having at hand effeetive argumen't in international diplomacy. That is the point that was made by Sir Aus- ; ten Chamberlain in a speech last ; year against the reduction of oqr | naval strength, and it applies k with even greater force in regard to our strength in aircraft.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19321124.2.17.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 388, 24 November 1932, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
366

NATIONAL AIR FORCE Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 388, 24 November 1932, Page 4

NATIONAL AIR FORCE Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 388, 24 November 1932, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert