Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL COURT DECISION

(Press. Assn.-

— By Telegraph — Copyrlght).

Wellington, Friday. It was incorrectly stated in a report of an Appeal Court judgment in the case of Bishop v. the New Zealand Law Society, that Mr. Justice ICennedy, in a written judgment, had disagreed with the other members of the court. Actually, Mr. Justice Kennedy in a separate judgment agreed with the other members of the court.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19321022.2.29.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 360, 22 October 1932, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
66

APPEAL COURT DECISION Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 360, 22 October 1932, Page 5

APPEAL COURT DECISION Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 360, 22 October 1932, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert