"A BUCK A

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 326, 13 September 1932, Page 4

"A BUCK A

SEQUEL TO MYSTERIOU?J TO hotei assaibushman~Boi The sequel to a {t yard of an Hotel j Aiigust 27 was the Michael Joseph "Wij ael James .Pulley, 5 est Patrick Pulle^ Wilson, an Austrai the court on a chat - Joseph McGeogh. j and bound over to fe Senior-Sergeant C Wilson had made an to McGeogh, calliuj and Tan." Mr. Carter, who a| son, asked that witi out of court. Joseph McGeogh g he was leaving the.ti? came in. Wilson m McCahe £Do you knrj Cabe said that he son said "That — — and Tan" in the Oldj then rushed witnessj the forehead, hrealds ness fell into a case whereupon Wilson | "Look .out,.. he's go| with a bottle." Witi previous disputes ^ with Wilson, who « casion had threatea guts in." There b arguments with aecj ehain and dahxage.to! riess h'ad endeavojirei aceused and had gin cation to assault M not want anything tt who was "always laj whom witness would in the dark. To Mr. Carter, wit had once been friej bnt denied meeting the day of the assai: a mongre th'at McCahe and iil and witness heard scs cerning himself ahd did not speak to 1 using any abusive i the assault witness i stay for a moment ai rect t'o state that H to wait until witney the police. James Alexander worker, gave evidene the hotel when Wi had a drink. They i tory and McGeogh ti turned to witness ai that man, he's a "1 Wilson rushed McG him. Witness heard McGeogh had taken but witness did not hand. Wilson put M McGeogh's neck ai with his right. McG ness up and got hira the police station ai ment. Not Quam To Mr. Carter, wit had not discussed i McGeogh. He was ii disposition nor quara did not recollect as being used by McGei Contable Roberts, watchhouse when Mi detailed his injuriei the statements of 1 Cabe, he went t'o ! whom they found late explanation, Wilson i any statement, bnta make one in the box, being spoken to and drinks. Wilson wai sober, but quarrelsoa For the defence, that there was an )! over a dog-chain. K son and called him grel." Wilson did d they met and Mc0ep| Michael Joseph 1 ence that he had ma: two years. He k® they were friends ud were worried. He) and had warned dogs. Witness then! ous differences he b Geogh. On Augusti conversation with.® asked for his dog-cha abused him. Witnes Geogh and the fraci ness endeavouring t past McGeogh, who' Witness denied cafo insulting name and 3 had tried to hit to To Senior-Sergt, Cf mitted that he had! the last 17 years asg victions for assault,! of the peace, and on«l guage. _ i The Bench said 18 obvious that defeitoi complainant and tha|l not attempted to stiij bottle. There had hy McGeogh, but all had come from convicted. .1 After perusing vious convictions, ® that the trouble wa5 him. He would he I* months to keep the? £25, and one surety