SUGAR PREFERENCES
(Press. Assn. —
INVIDIOUS DISTINCTION BETWEEN DOMINIONS AND COLONIES
■By Telegraph— Copyrlght).
Rec. April 21. 10.35 p.m. LONDON, Thursday. The Morning Post commenting on the sugar relief presumes that the provisions under which' Queensland and Natal will he at a disadvantage compared with the West Indies and Maurities, will be only temporary pending the "grand inquest" at Ottawa. If so, it was regrettable that Mr. Chamberlain did not say so, and thus avoid the impression that a new and invidious departure in policy was intended. The position of Queensland and Natal was hardly less serious than that of Mauritius and the West Indies the paper eoncluded.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19320422.2.45
Bibliographic details
Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 1, Issue 205, 22 April 1932, Page 5
Word Count
107SUGAR PREFERENCES Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 1, Issue 205, 22 April 1932, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Rotorua Morning Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in