Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

Press Association. Dunedin, May 99. The Supreme Court criminal sittings were completed tn-day. Matthew Christie was sentenced to mx months-' imprisonment and ordered to receive 15 lashes for indecent assault oa a yonng girl, and Sidney McDonald was acquitted on the same charge. It was not shown that McDonald was a party with Christie to the offone'. Michael O’Doiuie.h? was 'found not guilty of attempting to defeat the ends of justice by bribery. No evidence was offered in a second charge, and His Honoredireoted that a verdict of not guilty should be returned. Christchurch, May 30.

In divorce, before Justice Deuniston. Louisa Martin petitioned for a dissolution of her marriage with James Crosby Martin, of Auckland, barrister, on the ground of adultery. There was no appearance of the respondent. F. K. Hunt gave evidence that the respondent was a corespondent in the divorce case of Simms v, Simms and Martin, and letters written by the respondent admitting misconduct were put in. A decree nisi Was granted. Arthur Gibbs petitioned for'a dissolution of his marriage with Annie Gibbs, on the ground of desertion. There was no appearance of the respondent. Petitioner gave evidence that he was married in August, 190 S, and his wife left him in November, and he had not seen her since. Respondent had refused to do the washing or the cooking, and went away to Wellington. His Honor granted a decree, subject to further evidence as to service. Mary Harding petitioned for the dissolution £of her marriage with Reginald James Henry Harding on the ground of the latter’s desertion. Respondent did not appear. Evidence was given that the parties were married in 1899. The husband left a few months afterwards, and petitioner procured a maintenance order. The respondent kept up his payments under the order for some years, and then petitioner lost sight of him altogether, and for the last five years she had been earning, her own living. His Honor granted a decree.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19090531.2.47

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9459, 31 May 1909, Page 5

Word Count
329

SUPREME COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9459, 31 May 1909, Page 5

SUPREME COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9459, 31 May 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert