FEILDING COURT.

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIII, Issue 9118, 10 April 1908, Page 8

FEILDING COURT.

(Before Mr Thomson, S.M.)

Judgments -were given for. the plaintiffs with costs in the following undefended cases: —Mr O. Aagard v. Charles Lorefct, claim £1 19s Gd, costs 15s;' E. A. Ransom v. W. Wischnowsky, claim 9s, coats £1 3s; G. J. Wason v. George Reid, claim 3s 6d, costs 9s; R. U. Harden v. Alex Stevenson, claim £BS 16s 9cl, costs £4 14s; R. Dudley v. Wischnowsky, claim £2 14s 3(1, costs £1 8s; R. P. Smith v. Charles Smith, claim £7 5s 9d, costs £1 9s; J. H. Ashworth v. F. Wildbore, claim £2 2s 4d, costs 10s; J. H. Ashworth v. George Smith, claim £3 19 3d, costs £1 3s' Gd ;J. H. Ashworth v. G. S. Farrer, claim £8 Bs, costs ss; J. H. Ashworth v. J. Hughes, claim £5, 16s lOd, costs 19s Gd ; J. A. Rodgers v. W. Brown, claim £6 6s, costa 23s Gd; Amesbury Bros. v. A. Reid, claim £7 2s lid, costs £1 8s Gd ; E. Kiug v. George Cook, claim £1 9s lid, costs ss; Feilding Borough Council v. R. G. Bell, claim £1 12s lid, costs os; Daniel Wareham v. T. Foss, claim £G, costs 23s Gd; Deputy Official Assignee v. J. Davies, claim £8 10s, costs £1 5s Gd ; Oroua County Council v. H. J. Hunter, claim £1 5s Gd, costs ss; P. Flaveli v. Thos. Graham, claim £4 12s 3d, costs ss; same v. Clara Merrey, claim for possession of dwelling house. Order made for possession on 15th April; New Zealand Loan & Mercantile v. George Reid, claim £4, costs 15s. JUDGMENT SUMMONS. A. Williamson v. W. Ridcller, claim £3 9s Gd. Amount to be paid forthwith or in default three days’ imprisonment in Wanganui gaol. DEPENDED GASES. Oroua County Council v. Mas Eichler, claim £1 Is 9d. The defendant produced a receipt for the amount and was granted 8s costs. W. A. Saudilauds v. Albert Durrau, claim £B. Judgment for plaintiff with £1 9s costs. Bull & George v. James Harvey, claim £2 2s Gd for rent of a hut. Judgment was given for the plaintiff with £1 12s costs.

John Horne v. Herbert Henson, claim £7, for hire of horse and dray. Judgment for defendant with costs £2 9s.

Isabella Stewart v. Thomas and Mrs Stewart, claim for return of a horse or its value £l7. The plaintiff in this case is the widow of the late sou of the defendants and the point to he decided was as to whether the late sou owned the horse or the parents. Mr lunes was for the plaintiff and Mr Saudilauds for the defendants. Judgment was given for tiie defendants with counsel’s fee £1 Is.

Fred Richmond j|v. F, West, claim £55 12s 4d. The claim was reduced

by consent to £3B and judgment given for that amount with £3 3s costs.