FEILDING COURT.
ris following eases were heard yesterJWore Sir A. D. Thomson, S.M. E. Willis v. H. Moore, claim £4> 13s. -.Tudgnietit for plaintiff with IS's costs. v A. W. Nicholson v. W, Chronfeldt. 03 Gd,—Judgment for plaintiff witn 7S r S McCleland v. G. claim ilO 18s 6d. This was .£8 for orer.t {he rate of time end a quartern, d B ud a half for Saturdays and x* Mr Carty for the ae| e^£ nt eiided that For the defence it''‘« emlin an d a s the plaintiff had been- and there . Such represented the an , ard of t he fore was not affected an „ ho Arbitration Court, equal to those tod receiving^ payable under receiving £3 a The payment at a proweek ot * B *£g for overtime. His claim portionate r. yjd for Saturdays i V£US overtime While admitting he was ShX the defendant said it ® ctm J, u , in regard to the progress of the
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19070801.2.46
Bibliographic details
Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 8878, 1 August 1907, Page 3
Word Count
159FEILDING COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 8878, 1 August 1907, Page 3
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.