Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FEILDING COURT.

An Amusing Case.

Besides the usual ci-op bf drunks after a race meeting, yesterday at Feildiug a farmer appeared at the Police Court on the charge of resisting the police and his case created quite a tangle, which left the whole court in a flutter at the finish. It sesms that on Monday night at ten o’clock a drunken man lay in the gutter in front of an hotel. A policeman in plain clothes was directed by the sergeant, who was also present, to take charge of him. but on going forward to do so was interrupted by the aforesaid farmer, who had rushed out of the hotel and was now demanding fair play for the drunk, under the impression that some ouo was going to assault an acquaintance of liis own. Not desisting when warned to do so, he, too, was taken into custody and then he found, when too late, that he had been acting under a false impression. The charge entered against him, apparently' in error, was for “resisting” the police, but there was no evidence in support of such a charge. AA’heu that, fact was clear tho Bench was requested to amend tho information by inserting the word “obstructing” in place of “resisting,” in the charge, but the solicitor for the defendant, Mr Saudilauds, objected, contending that the charge having been duly made and replied to, could not bo amended. The Beuch accepted this view, hut nevertheless found the farmer guilty. Thereupon Mr Saudilauds told tho Bench, that after such a judgment, he would never plead again in that court before a Bench as they constituted. At Feildiug Court this morning E. Campbell, for having travelledfrom Palmerston to Foil ding without a ticket, was fined ss; a woman, who had been drunk in a public place was fined 5s or 34 hours; A. Pitcher for having boon drunk was convicted and discharged.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19070403.2.44

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8777, 3 April 1907, Page 2

Word Count
318

FEILDING COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8777, 3 April 1907, Page 2

FEILDING COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8777, 3 April 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert