Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A SINGULAR CASE.

Per Press Association. Wellington March 7.

Justice Cooper and a special jury of twelve wore engaged to-day in hearing the case of John Bussell, of Waitara, and George Pott, of Now Plymouth, versus the Kegistrar-General of Lands.' Plaintiffs had leased from Murgatfoyd Bros., who held the land under Tease from the AVaitara Harbour Board of three acres at Waitara for the purposes of a felmongery and created cprtniji buildings and machinery. After those improveincuts had been effected the title was claimed by certain natives by virtue of a Crown grant issued to them prior to the registration of the lease or any grant issued to the AA r aitara Harbour Board, — A the northern boundary of the land was claimed by "atWjw a stream, wiiich separated it from u—J 1 maindor of the land included in plaintiff’s leasehold. This stream was «Sed by plaintiff Pott for the purpose of his' business.- : In August 1904 the native owners brought an'actio* against the plaintiff claiming that ho ■ had trespassed' on the land in question, and had dammed,, fouled, or otherwise misused the waters flowing in ths stream. On the trial of that action the native owners recovered damages to the extent of JMB and costs, and by reason of j his verdict Pott declared that the pro_perty was consequently absolutely ijsgless to him. ’ The present case was brought for assessment of damages and the plaintiff claimed 41000, The jury, after an absence of three-quarters of an, hopr, returned a verdictiby a majority of top to two, which, by consent of the parties, was accepted, of .£750. J udgment was ingly entered with costs on the highest scale.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19070308.2.34

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8759, 8 March 1907, Page 2

Word Count
278

A SINGULAR CASE. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8759, 8 March 1907, Page 2

A SINGULAR CASE. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXI, Issue 8759, 8 March 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert