Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BULL CASE AND "TELEGONY."

Sir,- I make no apologies in askng for a little space to put the othei ide forward in the above case (o. which I know nothing except wha; v'iis reported in your paper), it beg a matter of considerable import .ice to faimers. Mr. Montgomeric ,ior yet the writer of the article i' Friday's issue, do not believe in 'telegony," and ridicule the idea, -feu", 'now can they explain the following facts, which I can absolutely voue for:

Some years ago I bought a pure »ed Yorkshire sow, whicii in th :ourse of six or seven litteis neve threw anything but white pigs.

lif.ted her with a Tamworth boa 'pure), and she had six white pig •nd two reds, typical Tamworths. Ti ext time she was mated to a Yori shire boar (and to my certain know 'edge no Tamworth boar was withi miles of her), when she again hat six white pigs and two reds, the lat ter showing the characteristics of th Tamworth, but to a less marked de gree than those in the first cross bred litter. From that time on th' sow has never again been guilty o giving birth to a coloured pig. 1 d-> not know how veterinarians regar< "telegony," but I know that as fa back as 1897 one of the greatest living authorities on bees, an Austriar count, recognised and firmly believei in it in mating of these insects. M\ own experience is that almost invari ably the second season's calves frorr a herd of cows from any particulai bull will more truly follow that bull's type than the calves of the first sea son, and I know of numbers of farm ers who can testify to this by thei; own experience.

Mr. Montgomerie, to my mind, is also wrong in the latter half of his letter. Surely the responsibility oi looking after a bull should righth fall on the owner, and I am sure that most farmers would have it so When a man helps a bull, boar, stallion, or any other beast with th' srme inclination to roam, it is up tf him to look after it. We know tha; rccidents like that mentioned in this case will happen, and are hard luck for the unfortunate who has to pay but I am afraid that were the owner not liable such accidents would bt far more frequent. H. O. MELLSOP.

Kohekohe, November 29, 1920,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PWT19201130.2.11.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Pukekohe & Waiuku Times, Volume 9, Issue 588, 30 November 1920, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
409

THE BULL CASE AND "TELEGONY." Pukekohe & Waiuku Times, Volume 9, Issue 588, 30 November 1920, Page 2

THE BULL CASE AND "TELEGONY." Pukekohe & Waiuku Times, Volume 9, Issue 588, 30 November 1920, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert