R. M. COURT.

Pahiatua Star and Eketahuna Advertiser, Volume 1, Issue 7, 2 July 1886, Page 4

R. M. COURT.

Woodvxu.b, Friday, June 25. (before Captain Trccce, 11. M.) BOARD AND LODOINO.

11. Naylor v. 11. Itlnsirs, claim of X 29» 2d. balance of board end lodging account.

Mr liothsr.l appeared for plaintiff The parties in the action reside at Tahistus, and plaintiff ailrg.-d that defendant 10-iged with him from April 7, 18*5, to May 26. The claim wan for balance of the account.

Judgment wa* given for plaintiff with co«t» 15s, witnesses' ex(H-nscii 16s, and aolicitor'e fee AT Is. CLAIM FOR WAOEN. Taggart v. Somergill.—A claim of Al 7 7s fsl f, r wages as cook, alleged to be due. Mr Gothard was for defendant. • v inetilui ago plaintiff was engaged by defendant st Napier in the capacity of cook, and afterwards went to I'ahiatua, at the iii'iance of a Mr Eawrance, on, as he alleged, defendant's behalf. Defendant was non united with costs, the d. f.-ndant Ixiug allowed 18s, and koheitor’s fee, XI Is. ALLKOLD RHEACII I.E CONTRACT. A.Wtl v. Sedcole.—This wa* a claim for XBO damages, alleged to havo been si;-'.nned by plaintiff by reason of defendant refusing to allow him to complete his contract with the defendant f>r cutting all timber put through the defcnilant'a saw mill for a term of 12 months from Ist October, 1885.

.Mr Burnett wa* for plaintiff; Mr Gothard apj«earing for defendant. The defence was a reejuon of the contra, t which was proved to the (.'sorts satisfaction.

I'laintitf was ca«t in coats as follows : C-Mirl cost (>S, three w itnesses for defence at AT 6h each, and one at XI —X4 15s; solicitor's fee, X'3 3s,