SUPREME COURT.

Poverty Bay Standard, Volume I, Issue 19, 8 December 1883, Page 2

SUPREME COURT.

The following is a complete list of the cases aeb down fur nearing in tne .supreme Uuurt:— M. Jennings v. W. Biwobuy, claim £3uU detinue; counsel fur plain till, Mr. H J. I’luu, and for deleudaut, Air. J. AlcG. Eraser, it. U. Junuatoue v. C. Priestly t claim £2OO fur specific performance; Air, H. J. biun fur plaintiff, and Air. E. Whit, combe lor the uefeuce. lulu Nihouihu v K. ff. Ward, cialm £l2O and fo r debt; Air. dievwnght for the plaiiiiilf au j Air. H. E. Kenny for the defence. C. Priestly v. K. C. Johnstone, claim £2OO for recovery of land ; Air. F. Whitcombe for the plaintiff, and Air. H. J. Finn for the defence. M* Mulloly v. J. A. Jury, claim £165 2s 6d for debt; Mr. H. J. Finn for the plaintiff, and Mr. W. L. Rees for lhe defence. K. G. Gibbons v. A. Graham and others, claim £lOO for debt ; Messrs. Lusk and Burton for plaintiff. Wi Te Rake and others v. N. Z. N. L. S. Company, claim to hive a deed of conveyance of the Paramata Block, containing 9,426 acres, cancelled ; Messrs. Carlisle and McLean for the plaintiff’s, and Mr. VV. L. Rees for the defendant Company. C. Priestly v. F. J. Piesse, claim £2OO for debt;

Mr. F. Whitcombe for plaintiff, and Mr, H. J. Finn for the defendant. Aronate Rangitere v. Mangakahia, claim £8,750 for possession of scrip and damage ; Mr. W. L. Rees for plaintiff and Mr F. Earl for defendant. R. Breinghan v. Graham and Kinross, claim £9OO for debt and interest; Mr. E. ff. Ward for plaintiff, and Messrs. Brassey and Fraser for the defence. M. Mulloly v. R. Finlay, claim £3OO ; Mr. H. J. Finn for plaintiff, and Messrs. Brassey and Fraser for defendant. H. J. Finn v. Wi Haronga, elaim £lB7 12s 8d for debt ; Messrs. Robinson for plaintiff. Cooper and Stubbs v. E. Clarke, claim for possession of land and decrees for accounts and injunctions; Mr. J. W. Nolan for plaintiff, and Messrs. Sievwright and Delatour for the defendant. W. Maude v. W. L. Rees, claim £1,015 18s, rent: Messrs. Brassey and Fraser for the plaintiff. N. Z. N. L. 8. Company aud P. Barker v. M. J. Gannon, claim possession of laud ; Mr. W. L. Rees for the Company. Cr Priestly v. C. D. Berry, claim on accounts; Mr. F, Whitcombe fu intiff, and Mr. J. W. Nolan for defenaant. J. Tutchen v. E. Cameron, claim £3OO for possession of land ; Mr. H. J. Finn for the plaintiff, and Mr. E. ff. Ward for the defence. \V. H. Tucker v. Wi Parone, detinue £485 7s; Mr. W. L Rees for the plaintiff, and Mr. Brassey for the defendant, W. L. Rees and Wi Pere v. J. W. Johnstone, specific performance of agreement; B. Taylor for the plaintiff, and Mr. Nolan for the defence. Of the foregoing, sixteen elect to be tried by Judge alone, one by special jury, and five by common jury.