RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.—GISBORNE.
[Before J. Boom,[Esq., R.M.] FbidaY, Juke 29. Common, Shellon & Co. v 1. Snana. No appearance of defendant Claim for dishonored cheque, £26 Is 4d; with interest £1 7s 2d. Judgment for the amount, £27 8a 6d and costs of Court, £2 3s. Moore v. A. Milled. No appearance of defendant. Claim £1 13s 9d, balance of account for goods supplied. Judgment for plaintiff for the amount claimed, with costs, 7s. Common, Shelton & Co. v. J. Muldoon. Claim £62 15s. Mr, Nolan appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Finn for the defendant Mr. Finn said that they admitted the claim, subject to the set off £95 12s od. "t| Afler several witnesses Were eiamined. whose evidence was somewhat conflicting, His Worship gave judgment for plaintiffs for £6l 13s 6d. Costs £lO. Oulton v. Goldsmith. Claim £lO Is 6d, for liquor Ac. supplied to defendant. Plaintiff in this case was an hotel keeper at the time the debt was contracted Judg. ment for £7 12s, costs £1
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18830630.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1323, 30 June 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
168RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.—GISBORNE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume XI, Issue 1323, 30 June 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in