Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE.

— We do not hoi 1 ourselves responsible for the opinions expressed by our correspondents]. BATHING. TO THE EDITOR. Sir, —Mr “Natator” in your issue of yesterday tries to assume a manly attitude in attempting a reply to “ Observer,” but completely fails to execute his intention by stepping aside from argument, and taking to abuse. We might almost conclude that he is the author of “Purity." Still in all the attempted replies given, none can deny the truth of the statement set forth by “ Observer,” and only replies by applying abusive names to the writer : he quotes cleanliness as being “next to godliness,” but still his tongue was very soiled, or I might say d ; ”ty, at the time of his writing; at least his inward thought must have been filthy, judging by the thoughts set forth. “ Natator ” might also acknowledge that truth is stranger than fiction in his ease, as the truth seems to have great effect on him. 1 may inform “Natator” that “Observer” has visited bathingplaces both in England and Scotland, but not in America, otherwise he may be capable of sounding his trumpet, such as “ Natator." Still “ Nutator ” requires purification, as will be seen by his writing. I may inform “Natator that the ladies quoted by “ Observer ” are possessed of superior modesty to his, otherwise they would not be capable of commenting on “assuming young man’s” modesty. I may also inform “Natator” that the ladies did not observe the “ assuming young man ” on the beach, as he tries to make out, but in the public streets, and the contents of his writings will at a glance be comprehended by the dullest mind as to whether there is a particle of the gentleman he boasts of in his epistles re bathing ; and although he boasts of his brain power, it is not in any way observable in any portion, except in the way of abuse without the aid of reasoning. “Observer's” letter must have a telling effect, otherwise it would not have caused so many replies.—l am, &c., Another Observer.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18821230.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Poverty Bay Standard, Volume X, Issue 1236, 30 December 1882, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
343

CORRESPONDENCE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume X, Issue 1236, 30 December 1882, Page 2

CORRESPONDENCE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume X, Issue 1236, 30 December 1882, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert