Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE.

TO THE EDITOR. Sib,—After hearing the evidence in the case of Miller v. C. D. Berry for wages, contractors should be careful how they engage workmen, especially laborers. Mr Berry, who has been the largest employer of labor in the district for some years past, and has always been the friend of honest workmen, was, I consider, very much wronged by the decision given by the Bench in this case through a quibble, viz., that tkere was no one present but Mr Berry and plaintiffs when wages were arranged.— Yours, etc., John Brown.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18820725.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Poverty Bay Standard, Volume X, Issue 1105, 25 July 1882, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
94

CORRESPONDENCE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume X, Issue 1105, 25 July 1882, Page 2

CORRESPONDENCE. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume X, Issue 1105, 25 July 1882, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert