Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IMPORTANT SHIPPING DECISION.

The owner of a tug undertook to tow a vessel in the Bay of Dublin, the vessel being in charge of a licensed pilot, as pilotage in Dublin Bay is compulsory. Whilst being tugged, the vessel ran aground ou a shoal, and her owners brought an action against the tug owner for damages. The claim was resisted on the ground that the vessel was guilty of contributory negligence in not cutting herself adrift when she found that by the

action of the tug she had been placed in danger. The Irish Court of Appeal decided in favor of the tug owner, and that the vessel had been guilty of contributory negligence. In reversing this decision, the Lord Chancellor is reported to have remarked that, when the immediate cause of the damage is

clearly the act of the defendant, it cannot be brought against the plaintiffs that they were guilty of contribu-

tory negligence because they had not in some earlier stage of the navigation taken a course themselves or controlled

the course taken by the tug in a way which would have avoided the danger.

The master of the vessel was entitled assume that the master of the tug knew what he was about. The tug mastor’s action in carrying the vessel across the bank was his own fault, and it was not contributory negligence in the vessel not to cut herself away from the tug. By such an act greater damage might have resulted, or it might have been represented more plausibly as an act of contributory negligence.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18810521.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Poverty Bay Standard, Volume IX, Issue 945, 21 May 1881, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
262

IMPORTANT SHIPPING DECISION. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume IX, Issue 945, 21 May 1881, Page 3

IMPORTANT SHIPPING DECISION. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume IX, Issue 945, 21 May 1881, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert