SUPREME COURT AUCKLAND.
APPEAL AGAINST VALIDITY OE ELECTION TO PROVINCIAL COUNCIL. This was an application for a rule nisi calling upon Joseph Crispe to show cause why he claims to hold the position and exercise the rights of a Provincial Councillor for the province of Auck land. Mr. Gillies appeared for the appellants, and stated the circumstances of the case. From the learned counsel’s statement it appeared that at the late Provincial election defendant and Benjamin Harris were candidates for the representation of Rama Rama, in the electoral district of Franklin, and at the election defendant was returned by a majority of 8 votes. Mr. Gillies said the motion was made under the Provincial Elections Act of 1858, section 9, which being one of the sections of that Act not'repealed by the Regulation of Elections Act, 1870 laid it down that the Electoral Roll for the House of Representatives shall be deemed conclusive evidence of the right to vote. Section 4of that Act provided the modes of breaking up the Electoral Roll for the House of Representatives into Rolls for the election of members of Provincial Councils. There was nothing said of these minor Rolls being conclusive evidence of voting right. On the contrary, by the Regulation of Elections Act, 1870, it was laid down that the right to vote in the Provincial Council election was determined in the same way as the right to vote in the House of Representatives election. It appeared that on the Electoral Roll for Rama Rama mistakes had occurred whereby several voted who had no right to vote, and others were prevented from voting who were entitled to by the Act above mentioned. The learned gentleman proceeded to show that had the votes been scrutinised properly the return of Mr. Harris would have been secured. In support of his argument Mr. Gillies put in the affidavits of Mr. Benjamin Harris, and also several affidavits from voters of the district. His Honor granted the rule nisi, making it returnable for Friday, Ist May.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBS18740428.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Poverty Bay Standard, Volume II, Issue 165, 28 April 1874, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
338SUPREME COURT AUCKLAND. Poverty Bay Standard, Volume II, Issue 165, 28 April 1874, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.