Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNPROVOKED ASSAULT.

A case of unprovoked assault was heard at the last sitting of the R.M. Court. James Simpson, livery stable-keeper, accused Robert Erskine, also a livery stable keeper, with striking him upon the back of the head. The evidence of complainant showed that on the night of the Queen’s Birthday he was standing outside the Central Hotel in company with Mr W Balrnforth, when he noticed accused coming down the street. He was passing from underneath Mr Adams’ verandah, and witness stepped into the hotel" to avoid him. While in the act of going through the door Erskine struck him a violent blow on the back of the head, and then passed on. He had not spoken to defendant at all ; he noticed that he was in liquor earlier in. the evening, and wished to keep out of his way. Mr Balrnforth corroborated Simpson’s evidence. He stated that Erskine had been in the house, and had been making a row and abusing witness. Mr G Balrnforth put him out. Witness intended to take proceedings against Erskine, who was very offensive when drunk. Erskine struck Simpson with great force. Witness had stepped inside the door, and was just coining out again when Simpson was struck. He fell up against witness, who had hold of the door, or otherwise be would have been knocked down.

R. Erskine denied having struck complainant. He was sober. Magistrate : If you say you were sober you must be committing perjury. Two witnesses state on oath that you were under the influence of liquor.

Defendant did not seem to like the appearance of the case, and then admitted that he had shoved Simpson. He urged that he had been provoked by the latter sneering at him. Magistrate said it was not the first time defendant had been before the Court. He had no regard for his oath, in fact he had rendered himself liable to prosecution in another court. His Worship had no doubt that the assault had been committed, and defendant would be fined 40s and costs, or in default ten days imprisonment.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18830604.2.11

Bibliographic details

Patea Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 1042, 4 June 1883, Page 2

Word Count
348

UNPROVOKED ASSAULT. Patea Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 1042, 4 June 1883, Page 2

UNPROVOKED ASSAULT. Patea Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 1042, 4 June 1883, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert