Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COUNTY AFFAIRS .

| - TO TEE EDITOR-■ ! Sir, —Such indifference evinced by the [ ratepayers of this County in respect of the I Council’s financial management, etc., can never be the wa} T to defer a recurrence of the like in the future, but will, instead, invite such in plentj r . Had there been any supervision whatever from any one of the councillors, had any one of them pressed for the production of the clerk’s accounts, these said to be irregularities could not have happened. Has it not passed some of the councillor’s lips these many months, that the clerk’s work was somehow adrift and not attended to ? What must be thought of the frequent carpings of the choicest of these councillors, one who would wish to be thought the paragon of every high moral preception ? When, in remonstration, he was challenged in reference to his best endeavours to deprive one local body within the County of its legal rights, he announces in lofty style that it was for the County he worked and supervised," not for hamlets, &c. How ranch at present can we value such rodomontading ? Is there any excuse for allowing these defections? Can there be the plea of inexperience ? No. Recall the circumstances surrounding the Wairoa Highway Board’s loss of some £BO, and not forgetting, too, the Council’s dog tax loss of yore, and this, I hold, should have been experience abundant. However, this boasting about supervision is none other than an insult to any intelligent ratepayer when such proceedings have been allowed as have recently been brought to light by the Government Auditor, and Which are now glaring in our eyes, and appealing to our pockets. Of these one hundred and more summonses how many will of necessity pay twice from loss of the niggardly small receipts issued? Why have not the present investigations been run before now to a termination. The ratepayers should demand full knowledge of what has transpired, and drag it into daylight.—l am, etc., Ratepayer. Waverley, Dec. 13.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18821220.2.15.1

Bibliographic details

Patea Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 974, 20 December 1882, Page 2

Word Count
334

COUNTY AFFAIRS. Patea Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 974, 20 December 1882, Page 2

COUNTY AFFAIRS. Patea Mail, Volume VIII, Issue 974, 20 December 1882, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert