ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE.
[We are at all times ready to give expression to every shade of opinion, but in no case do we hold ourselves responsible for the sentiments of our correspondents.] {To the Editor of the Patea Mail.) Sir, —Mr Kenah seems under the impression that the Wellington Highways Act makes no provision for auditing accounts, but he must not have understood what I stated at the nomination of Wardens. I (in reply to a question of a ratepayer) informed the meeting that the accounts were audited annually by the Government Auditor, but were not -published ( i.e ., advertised), as there was no provision in the Act directing that to be done. He will, therefore, see that under the above mentioned Act the expenditure of monies may not “ be kept completely shrouded in mystery.”—l am, &c., GEO. 8. BRIDGE. Wavcrley, March 6th, 1880.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18800310.2.14
Bibliographic details
Patea Mail, Volume V, Issue 498, 10 March 1880, Page 2
Word Count
142ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE. Patea Mail, Volume V, Issue 498, 10 March 1880, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in