HAWERA.
(from our own correspondent.) E.M. COURT.— Monday, June 17. (Before Captain Wilson, J.P., and J Livingstone, Esq., J.P.)
P. Conway v T. Owen, claim £7 for value of gold locket. Mr Roy appeared for the defence. Plaintiff stated that he had left llie locket in the charge of the deiendant’s barman, who, on leaving, had handed it over to defendant, whose nephew had taken it out of his room and lost it on his road to school. Defendant admitted that he had taken the locket, but that it had never been given into his charge. He had taken it out of the cash box and placed it in his own room for safer keeping. The plaintiff had offered him the locket for £2. ' Judgment for plaintiff for £2 and costs.
Lawrence Milmoe v Charles Reeombe. claim 8s for damage to window by a fowl of defendants. There, being no evidence to prove that, the fowl belonged to defendant, the case was dismissed with costs.
Same v Cornelias Casey, claim £2 12s for damage done to plaintiffs garden by defendant’s pigs. Evidence again being wanting to prove the ownership of the pigs, the case was dismissed with costs.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18780619.2.17
Bibliographic details
Patea Mail, Volume IV, Issue 331, 19 June 1878, Page 2
Word Count
198HAWERA. Patea Mail, Volume IV, Issue 331, 19 June 1878, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.